Who's idea was it to change a forms property to wsMinimized when the Form
was minimized while working in the IDE?
Without embedded designer, pressing F12 does indeed swap between code and
Form, but it still allows the form to cover up the other IDE Windows. So in
order to see them, you have to minimize the Form. Well, someone had the
great idea to change the form's property as well.
Man, Code Gear, you gotta fix this stuff. I have to add to all my Form
Create Routines the proper way to display forms because the IDE will NOT
leave them alone !!!!
The Proper FIX would be:
1) When pressing F12, Bring the form in front of all the IDE Windows, when
Pressing F12 again, put the Form behind ALL the IDE Windows.
2) When Minimizing a Form or moving it around, Leave the Form's properties
ALONE unless it's set to asDesigned.
Sorry, but getting a little Fed up with it. How many years have we had
decent IDE's that could properly minimize and maximize then since 2005 it
all got stupid.
Richard
For the IDE, i think its legal and correct
to leave a minimized form minimized on runtime.
cbo
"Richard" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:477d37ab$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Who's idea was it to change a forms property to wsMinimized when the Form
> was minimized while working in the IDE?
>
> Without embedded designer, pressing F12 does indeed swap between code and
> Form, but it still allows the form to cover up the other IDE Windows. So
> in order to see them, you have to minimize the Form. Well, someone had
> the great idea to change the form's property as well.
>
> Man, Code Gear, you gotta fix this stuff. I have to add to all my Form
> Create Routines the proper way to display forms because the IDE will NOT
> leave them alone !!!!
>
>
> The Proper FIX would be:
> 1) When pressing F12, Bring the form in front of all the IDE Windows, when
> Pressing F12 again, put the Form behind ALL the IDE Windows.
>
> 2) When Minimizing a Form or moving it around, Leave the Form's properties
> ALONE unless it's set to asDesigned.
>
> Sorry, but getting a little Fed up with it. How many years have we had
> decent IDE's that could properly minimize and maximize then since 2005 it
> all got stupid.
>
> Richard
>
Danny Strümpel wrote:
> Hard to translate, but I try to. Can't make a rhyme of it though.
>
> Here lies a man, quite alone,
> Fat in body, full of sins,
> We put him in his grave,
> Because we thought he died.
I'll take a shot at it:
Here lies a man in solitude
Full of sin and stuffed with food
We buried him outside
Because we thought he died
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] · Vertex Systems Corp. · Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
IB 6 versions prior to 6.0.1.6 are pre-release and may corrupt
your DBs! Open Edition users, get 6.0.1.6 from http://mers.com
Anyway, minimizing is so stupid....
You will preffer a preview rather than a bar ...even if the preview is a
bar...!
:)
"Richard" a écrit dans le message de news:
477d37ab$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Who's idea was it to change a forms property to wsMinimized when the Form
> was minimized while working in the IDE?
>
> Without embedded designer, pressing F12 does indeed swap between code and
> Form, but it still allows the form to cover up the other IDE Windows. So
> in order to see them, you have to minimize the Form. Well, someone had
> the great idea to change the form's property as well.
>
> Man, Code Gear, you gotta fix this stuff. I have to add to all my Form
> Create Routines the proper way to display forms because the IDE will NOT
> leave them alone !!!!
>
>
> The Proper FIX would be:
> 1) When pressing F12, Bring the form in front of all the IDE Windows, when
> Pressing F12 again, put the Form behind ALL the IDE Windows.
>
> 2) When Minimizing a Form or moving it around, Leave the Form's properties
> ALONE unless it's set to asDesigned.
>
> Sorry, but getting a little Fed up with it. How many years have we had
> decent IDE's that could properly minimize and maximize then since 2005 it
> all got stupid.
>
> Richard
>
Q Correll wrote:
> Luckily for you I don't get involved with such translations very often.
> ;-)
Sometimes it's very interesting to me, to find out the (cultural...)
background behind footers or other stuff in other languages. The given
footer was such a case, I found it amusing myself, even before your
question :-)
DoDi
--
2b|~2b?
Hans,
| Glad to assist you in every try :-)
Thanks.
Luckily for you I don't get involved with such translations very often.
;-)
--
Q
01/05/2008 16:37:18
XanaNews Version 1.17.5.7 [Q's Salutation mod]
Q Correll wrote:
> (I only have an English <=> Deutsch dictionary. The kind you hold in
> your hand, thumb through the pages, and read. )
That's what I use to use myself :-)
> | Otherwise you got it quite well, for a non-German-speaker ;-)
>
> Thanks. I'll try to do a tad better next time. ;-)
Glad to assist you in every try :-)
DoDi
Danny,
| Hard to translate, but I try to. Can't make a rhyme of it though.
Rhyming not a problem.
Thanks!
--
Q
01/05/2008 11:47:51
XanaNews Version 1.17.5.7 [Q's Salutation mod]
Hans,
| You (or your spellchecker) seem to confuse "verrückt" (crazy) and
| "verreckt" (perished, dead).
Yep!
| IMO "smart" also should be "fat".
That's what I first thought. But couldn't reconcile the idea with
"crazy."
(I only have an English <=> Deutsch dictionary. The kind you hold in
your hand, thumb through the pages, and read. )
| Otherwise you got it quite well, for a non-German-speaker ;-)
Thanks. I'll try to do a tad better next time. ;-)
--
Q
01/05/2008 11:49:28
XanaNews Version 1.17.5.7 [Q's Salutation mod]
Mega Search
Sign Up 
